Subscribe
Codifly / methodology

Trust starts with showing the work.

Our methodology keeps public data, our own observations and assumptions apart. That way you can disagree with a conclusion without losing the path that led to it.

5 min read
01Visible facts

Pricing, capabilities and documentation link to the public source, or are flagged as pending validation.

02Explainable scorecard

0-to-5 scores are not “official ratings”: they are a Codifly assessment with published criteria and a date.

03Usefulness before affiliation

The core result never depends on a purchase. If there is a commercial relationship, we disclose it next to the content.

On this page

A comparison is not a feature table. It is an explicit model of the risk, cost and work you are signing up for.

How we build a comparison

  1. Define the scenario

    We describe the team, cloud, stage and constraint being compared. A product can be excellent and still not fit that scenario.

  2. Pick the dimensions

    We prioritize time-to-value, ownership, technical depth, FinOps, support and total cost. The weighting changes with the use case.

  3. Score and explain

    Every score comes with a short rationale. When data is missing, we mark it as an inference instead of passing it off as certainty.

What a Codifly score means

1Weak for this scenario
3Covers the essentials
5Clear, demonstrable advantage

How to use it

Start from your team's scenario and constraint. Then use the table as a list of questions to ask, not as an automatic answer. See the C4C7OPS vs Qovery scorecard

  • Validate current pricing and terms.
  • Ask for a demo on your real architecture.
  • Measure the result against your baseline.